Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Photo Manipulation


Youn Jung Choi (Yuna)

LIS 471 Management of Photographical Archives

Photography changes everything: Photo Manipulation

 

Introduction

Photo manipulation has a long history from the invention of photography. Daguerreotype, the first commercial type of photography, also went through some retouching process. Since the early photo process could only express monotone color, photographers painted color on the photo to make the pictures more vivid and vibrant.

 
 

<Man by Fehrenbach: A quarter plate English tinted daguerreotype of a man with a daguerreotype on the table.>[1]


<Pink dress: Great tinting on this 9th plate daguerreotype of a young woman in a pink dress. >[2]
 

However, people sometimes did not manipulate photo images for good reasons, simply improving the image. One of the famous examples is the case of Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths. Two young girls who lived in Yorkshire, England claimed that they took a picture of live fairies in 1917. People continued arguing the authenticity of the photo until Elsie and Frances confessed their mischief in 1983.[3] They had manipulated the photo to trick people.


Shift to the digital world

After the invention of digital photography and image editing programs like “Photoshop,” it became much easier to manipulate photo images. As the technology has developed, the retouched photo images are becoming more natural and harder to recognize. From a minimum touch, like adjusting color balance or contrast, to completely creating a whole new image, we encounter edited images everywhere. For example, it is essential for entertainment, including movies as well as visual advertisements. Some images like below cannot be made without image editing programs.

 

<title: Summer time London
description: It’s summer time in London.. (eurostar) hilarious creative barber commercial.
user: Randy Orton [randyorton] country: United States date: Jun 2nd, 2008>[4]


<Photoshop Lady-Awesome Avatar Transformation using Photoshop>[5]

However, there are also dark sides of photo manipulation. People can use photo editing to distort the truth or influence people to have a slanted view.

 

-Political Photo Manipulation

As Jacob Riis and Lewis Hine pointed out earlier, the leverage which photo images has is enormous. Most of the time, an image is more eloquent and effective than written or spoken word.[6] Because of this characteristic, many politicians have used photo images for propaganda purposes, censorship purposes or making good images of themselves.

    


<The case of Nikolai Yezhov>[7]

Political photo manipulation caused by censorship was especially enacted under governance of the Soviet Union. Many politicians and key personnel were removed from photo images after they were purged. One famous example is the case of “Nikolai Yezhov.”

Nikolai Yezhov, who is standing on the right side of Stalin in the upper picture, was a member of the Presidium Central Executive Committee. He led and conducted purges of hundreds of thousands of people in the name of elimination of disloyalty to Stalin’s government. Ironically, Nikolai Yezhov himself also fell out of Stalin's favour and was executed in 1940.[8] After his death, the photo was retouched and his figure was removed as if he did not exist from the beginning. This picture shows the representative case of damnatio memoriae, which means "condemnation of memory" in the sense of a judgment that a person must not be remembered.[9]

 
<The portrait photography of Abraham Lincoln>[10]

A well-known example of photo manipulation for image making is the portrait photography of Abraham Lincoln. The body of Abraham Lincoln in the left image is in fact the Southern politician John Calhoun’s body (right image). This photo manipulation was made by piecing together multiple negatives to give more authoritative impression to the public.[11]


-Journalism

News media also have conducted photo manipulations for more dramatic effects and impressions. One famous example is the case of O.J. Simpson. In 1994, Orenthal James Simpson was arrested on the suspicion of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Among multiple publications that carried his mugshot, TIME Magazine altered the color saturation which made the skin color darker and burned out the corner of the image, giving a more negative impression.[12] 

 
<O.J. Simpson mugshot>[13]

Another case of media photo manipulation for dramatic effect is the Lebanon War photograph in 2006. The right image of an IDF (Israel Defense Forces) attack on Beirut photographed by Adnan Hajj turned out to be photoshopped. Compared to the original photo (left image), the manipulated image had darker and thicker smoke. Adnan Hajj made an excuse that he was trying to remove "dust marks,” not intentionally manipulating the image. However, Reuters admitted the fault and published the corrected version of the image.[14]

 
< 2006 Lebanon War photograph>[15]

-Fashion and Celebrities

Fashion photography is one of the areas in which photo manipulation is most frequently conducted. Flawless skin and perfect body shape of cover models and celebrities are usually the result of photoshopping.

Madonna, the pop queen, had some issues of retouching images. In 2008, she released Hard Candy, her eleventh studio album, and her face and body on the album were unbelievably perfect even though she was fifty years old at that time.[16] The left photo is the original photo and the right photo is the released album photo which has been photoshopped.
 

<the photosopped image of Madonna>[17] 

There are hundreds and thousands of manipulated pictures of celebrities. They have flawless skin without any wrinkles, freckles, blemishes and perfect shapes without extra fat or a flat chest.

  

<photosopped image of a model>[18]
 
 
<Keira Knightley, the movie King Arthur(2004) poster> [19]

These unrealistic images could bring about distorted aesthetic consciousness, especially in teenagers. The preference for a skinny body forces girls to lose weight excessively and this tendency even causes eating disorders or plastic surgery addictions. Fortunately, several celebrities, including Keira Knightley whose poster is above, rejected photoshopping to resist the distorted images of the body. [20]


Conclusion

Nowadays, it has become so easy to manipulate photo images by using software like Photoshop. However, image editing did exist even in 19th century. The history of photo manipulation started with the invention of photography. As mentioned before, the influence of images is enormous, so manipulation attempts were conducted to make the image more appealing to persuade people or insist on certain opinions.

What makes this problem more complex is that sometimes it is hard to tell whether it is intentional manipulation or not. Photography without any retouching also already has the subjective photographer’s view. As John Szarkowski argued in The Photographer’s Eye, a photographer chooses the subject, the detail, the frame, the time, and the vantage point.[21]  The photographer might intentionally subtract some object out of the frame to strengthen his opinion. Light and angle are also main factors which can alter the intention of the image dramatically. In other words, there are always possibilities to skew the reality outside of retouching by software.

Therefore, there are codes of ethics for photographers. The NPPA Code of Ethics says “visual journalists and those who manage visual news productions must be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects and resist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities.”[22]

Nowadays, we cannot imagine images without editing and it is not always deceptive. Photo image editing can maximize the effect of the photo and create an image which cannot exist in the real world. The important thing is that when the image is manipulated, the fact should be clearly stated and photographers know the influence of photo images and must follow the code of ethics.

 

Bibliography

-Margery Long and Lynn Ritzenthaler. Photographs Archival Care and Management. Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2006.

-“5 Celebrities Rejecting Hollywood's Photoshop Fever.” DoSomething.org.


-“Adnan Hajj photographs controversy.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnan_Hajj.

-“Awesome Avatar Transformation using Photoshop." PhotoshopLady.com.


-“Censorship of images in the Soviet Union.” Wikipedia.


-“Damnatio memoriae.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnatio_memoriae.

-“English daguerreotypes.” Dagurreotype.nl.


-“funny pic.” Funnypictures.com.



-“Lincoln photo manipulation using Calhoun’s body.” Jess Benson URBAN to RURAL.


-“Photo manipulation.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_manipulation.

-“The naked truth: Madonna without Photoshop.” celebrityfix.


 



[1] “English daguerreotypes,” Dagurreotype.nl, http://www.daguerreotype.nl/english_daguerreotypes/english.html.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Margery Long and Lynn Ritzenthaler, Photographs Archival Care and Management (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2006), 8.
[5] “Awesome Avatar Transformation using Photoshop," PhotoshopLady.com, http://www.photoshoplady.com/photoshop-tutorial/awesome-avatar-transformation-using-photoshop/.
[6] Margery Long and Lynn Ritzenthaler, Photographs Archival Care and Management (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2006), 11.
[7]Photo manipulation,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_manipulation.
[8]Censorship of images in the Soviet Union,Wikipedia,
[9]Damnatio memoriae,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnatio_memoriae.
[10] “Lincoln photo manipulation using Calhoun’s body,” Jess Benson URBAN to RURAL,
[11] Ibid.
[12]Photo manipulation,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photo_manipulation.
[14] “Adnan Hajj photographs controversy,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnan_Hajj.
[15] Ibid.
[16] “The naked truth: Madonna without Photoshop,” celebrityfix, http://celebrities.ninemsn.com.au/?blogentryid=283278&showcomments=true.
[18]  Ibid.
[19] Ibid.
[20] “5 Celebrities Rejecting Hollywood's Photoshop Fever,” DoSomething.org, http://www.dosomething.org/news/5-celebrities-rejecting-hollywoods-photoshop-fever
[21] Margery Long and Lynn Ritzenthaler, Photographs Archival Care and Management (Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2006), 6-7.
[22] “NPPA Code of Ethics,” NNPA, https://nppa.org/code_of_ethics
 

No comments:

Post a Comment